Melan Arch Bridge: Embedded Steel Ribs and Ideal Arch Reactions

← Back to Engineering Library

The Melan system embeds curved steel ribs within a concrete arch. Explore that construction arrangement and, in a separate statics exercise, calculate support reactions for an ideal three-hinged parabolic arch.

Ideal Three-Hinged Parabolic-Arch Reactions

Enter span, rise and a full-span uniform vertical line load. Results apply only to a symmetric three-hinged parabolic idealization and do not allocate force between concrete and steel.

0°

Horizontal reaction
--
Vertical reaction
--
Support resultant
--
Rise/span ratio
--

Equation Used

H=w L^2/(8 f); V=w L/2; R=sqrt(H^2+V^2)
The reactions follow equilibrium of a symmetric three-hinged parabolic arch with level springings, a crown hinge and uniform load over the horizontal span.
  • The comparison arch is symmetric, three-hinged and parabolic with level supports.
  • Uniform vertical load acts over the complete horizontal span.
  • Only support reactions are computed; section forces, stiffness, material sharing and construction stages are excluded.
  • The worksheet is not a model of any particular historic Melan bridge.

Span, rise and uniform line load determine the reactions in the stated three-hinged idealization. These reactions do not establish how a real Melan bridge shares load between its concrete and steel.

Watch the Melan Bridge in motion
Video: Throwback Thursday with Topeka History Guy for 6/29/17: Remembering the Melan Bridge on YouTube. Used here to complement the diagram below.

Curved steel ribs embedded in concrete

Official historic-bridge records describe Josef Melan's system as curved parallel steel beams embedded in concrete. The Rock Rapids bridge used five 4-inch I-beams within its concrete arch.

The drawing illustrates that documented topology. It does not assign a universal percentage of load to either material.

Historical context and a separate statics exercise

Use the calculator only to inspect support reactions for the stated ideal arch. It cannot assess a historic bridge, design a new bridge, size reinforcement, stage a pour or establish capacity.

Symmetric three-hinged idealization

H=w L^2/(8 f); V=w L/2; R=sqrt(H^2+V^2)

These are equilibrium reactions for a separate symmetric parabolic arch with three hinges and full-span uniform load. A real Melan bridge may have different geometry, continuity, loading and material interaction.

Reaction example

For L=30 m, f=3.75 m and w=100 kN/m, the ideal worksheet gives H=3.00 MN, V=1.50 MN, R=3.35 MN and f/L=0.125.

Material interaction and structural limits

Force sharing between concrete and embedded steel depends on section properties, material stiffness, compatibility and structural continuity. It is not calculated by these support-reaction equations. Real bridge analysis requires drawings, materials, boundary conditions, load combinations, deterioration data and applicable standards.

Melan-arch worksheet questions

Does this calculate force in the embedded steel?

No.

Does it model the Rock Rapids bridge?

No. The equations are a separate ideal statics exercise.

Can it rate an existing bridge?

No.

Official history and structural reference

Building or designing a mechanism like this?

Explore the precision-engineered motion control hardware used by mechanical engineers, makers, and product designers.

← Back to Mechanisms Index
Share This Article
Tags: