Magneto-Electric Machine: Sinusoidal Flux-Linkage Model

← Back to Engineering Library

In a Pixii-type magneto, a permanent magnet rotates beneath fixed coils and changes the magnetic flux through them. Explore that arrangement and calculate ideal induced voltage for a sinusoidal flux-linkage waveform.

Ideal Sinusoidal Magneto EMF Calculator

Enter turns, peak flux per turn, electrical frequency and an ideal external resistance. Voltage follows Faraday's law; load current and power assume a zero-impedance source and are not machine ratings.

0°

Ideal RMS EMF
--
Peak EMF
--
Ideal load current
--
Ideal load power
--

Equation Used

lambda=N Phi_pk cos(2 pi f t); e_pk=2 pi f N Phi_pk; E_rms=e_pk/sqrt(2); I=E_rms/R; P=E_rms^2/R
Phi_pk is peak magnetic flux through each turn and f is electrical frequency. The ideal source has no winding resistance, inductance, core loss, saturation, leakage, rectifier, commutator or mechanical loss.
  • Every turn links the same sinusoidal peak flux Phi_pk.
  • Electrical frequency is entered directly rather than inferred from an unspecified pole count and shaft speed.
  • The external load is purely resistive and the ideal source has zero internal impedance.

The assumed sinusoidal flux linkage determines peak and RMS induced voltage. Current and power use a separate ideal resistive load with zero source impedance; real generator losses and internal impedance are not included.

Rotating permanent magnet and fixed coils

The Smithsonian describes Pixii's early magneto as a permanent magnet rotating beneath coils. The changing flux through the coils induces alternating EMF. A commutator can redirect alternating half-cycles, but it is not part of this AC calculation.

The animation shows that topology schematically and displays a sinusoidal flux-linkage assumption; it is not a field or machine-design simulation.

Faraday-law arithmetic only

Use the calculator to explore how an assumed sinusoidal peak flux linkage and electrical frequency set ideal open-circuit EMF. The ideal load readouts deliberately exclude the internal impedance and losses needed to predict a real terminal voltage, current, power or temperature.

Sinusoidal flux linkage

lambda=N Phipk cos(2 pi f t); epk=2 pi f N Phipk; Erms=epk/sqrt(2)

Faraday's law gives e=-d lambda/dt. For the separately stated ideal resistor, I=Erms/R and P=Erms2/R. Those are ideal-load arithmetic, not generator ratings.

Arithmetic example

For N=1,000, Phipk=0.001 Wb and f=20 Hz, peak EMF is 125.66 V and RMS EMF is 88.86 V. An ideal zero-impedance source feeding 5,000 ohms gives 0.0178 A and 1.58 W. A real machine will differ.

Model boundary

Real design requires the actual winding distribution, field map, magnet curve, core, air gap, speed, internal impedance, commutation or rectification, thermal limits and test data.

Magneto model questions

Is 4.44 a universal machine constant?

No. It is 2 pi/sqrt(2), rounded, for this sinusoidal flux-linkage waveform. Other waveforms have different factors.

Does ideal load power predict generator output?

No. It ignores source impedance and all losses.

Can electrical frequency be converted to shaft speed?

Only with the actual pole/event count and topology, which are not entered here.

Institutional and technical references

Building or designing a mechanism like this?

Explore the precision-engineered motion control hardware used by mechanical engineers, makers, and product designers.

← Back to Mechanisms Index
Share This Article
Tags: